Top firm list
Personal injury firms that advertise contingency fee arrangements.
| Rank | Firm | Rating | Reviews | Consultation | Languages | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C Personal injury attorney |
4.9 | 927 | Free | Spanish | Sep 3, 2026 |
| 2 | McMinn Personal Injury Lawyers Austin Personal injury attorney |
4.9 | 361 | Free | English | Sep 5, 2026 |
| 3 | TK Injury Lawyers: Austin Personal Injury Lawyer Personal injury attorney |
5.0 | 230 | Free | Spanish | Sep 7, 2026 |
| 4 | Wayne Wright, LLP Personal injury attorney |
4.8 | 388 | Free | English | Sep 7, 2026 |
| 5 | Glen Larson Law Injury Attorneys Personal injury attorney |
4.9 | 135 | Free | Spanish, American Sign Language | Sep 2, 2026 |
| 6 | Law Offices of Blake Fulton Quackenbush Personal injury attorney |
4.9 | 105 | Free | Spanish | Sep 4, 2026 |
| 7 | LGR Law Firm Personal injury attorney |
4.9 | 98 | Free | English | Sep 4, 2026 |
| 8 | Thomas J. Henry Law Personal injury attorney |
4.7 | 3,085 | Free | English | Sep 7, 2026 |
| 9 | Anderson Injury Lawyers Austin Personal injury attorney |
5.0 | 205 | Free | English | Sep 1, 2026 |
| 10 | Glasheen, Valles & Inderman Injury Lawyers Personal injury attorney |
5.0 | 51 | Free | Spanish | Sep 2, 2026 |
Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. The firm also advertises contingency / no-fee-unless-recovery terms. Details were checked on September 3, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
McMinn Personal Injury Lawyers Austin qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. The firm also advertises contingency / no-fee-unless-recovery terms. Details were checked on September 5, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
TK Injury Lawyers: Austin Personal Injury Lawyer qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. The firm also advertises contingency / no-fee-unless-recovery terms. Details were checked on September 7, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
Wayne Wright, LLP qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. The firm also advertises contingency / no-fee-unless-recovery terms. Details were checked on September 7, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
Glen Larson Law Injury Attorneys qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. The firm also advertises contingency / no-fee-unless-recovery terms. Details were checked on September 2, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
Law Offices of Blake Fulton Quackenbush qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. The firm also advertises contingency / no-fee-unless-recovery terms. Details were checked on September 4, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
LGR Law Firm qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. The firm also advertises contingency / no-fee-unless-recovery terms. Details were checked on September 4, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
Thomas J. Henry Law qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. The firm also advertises contingency / no-fee-unless-recovery terms. Details were checked on September 7, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
Anderson Injury Lawyers Austin qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. The firm also advertises contingency / no-fee-unless-recovery terms. Details were checked on September 1, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
Glasheen, Valles & Inderman Injury Lawyers qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. The firm also advertises contingency / no-fee-unless-recovery terms. Details were checked on September 2, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
As of August 26, 2026, 10 Austin firms qualified with 5+ Google reviews and were ranked by directory best match (same ranking as site search). Verified profiles and profile search boost can affect best-match order; Featured modules are still labeled separately. Confirm current ratings and services directly with each firm.
71 Austin-area firms tagged for personal injury were evaluated. To qualify, a firm needed a practice focus matching personal injury; a contingency / no-fee-unless-recovery claim; at least 5 Google reviews (lower threshold for this attribute-focused list). Rankings used directory best match (same ranking as site search). Firms with insufficient or outdated information were omitted rather than assigned estimated values. The data was last checked on August 26, 2026.
Austin Personal Injury Firms Offering No Fee Unless Recovery is a published FindAustinLawyers ranking of Austin-area firms that met this page’s eligibility rules.
To appear here, a firm needed a practice focus matching personal injury; a contingency / no-fee-unless-recovery claim; at least 5 Google reviews.
Placement uses an organic directory score based on profile completeness, reviews, practice-area fit, freshness, and client-experience themes. Paid Featured, Verified, and subscription status do not affect eligibility or numbered rank.
Confirm ratings, fees, language support, and availability directly with each firm before hiring.
These firms advertised contingency or no-fee-unless-recovery terms when last checked. Ask what percentage applies before and after filing suit, and who pays case expenses if there is no recovery.
Firms were ranked using an organic directory score based on profile completeness, reviews, practice-area fit, freshness, and client-experience themes. Review count, profile freshness, then firm name break ties. Manual reordering is not used on auto-ranked lists.
No. Paid Featured modules, Verified badges, and subscription status do not affect eligibility or numbered placement on this list. Any sponsored module is labeled Featured and kept outside the ranked results.
Ratings, review counts, consultation offers, fee claims, and language claims are dated snapshots. Confirm the current details directly with each firm before hiring.
No. Ratings and review volume are useful signals, but fit, deadlines, conflict checks, communication style, and fee terms matter more. Use this list as a shortlist, then interview firms.
Ask who will handle your matter day to day, what outcomes are realistic, how fees and expenses work, what the first thirty days look like, and what weaknesses they see in your case.
Independent ranking · paid Featured status does not affect placement. Interactive version