1. Thomas J. Henry Law
Thomas J. Henry Law qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. Details were checked on September 7, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
Top firm list
Personal injury firms ordered by Google review volume.
| Rank | Firm | Rating | Reviews | Consultation | Languages | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thomas J. Henry Law Personal injury attorney |
4.7 | 3,085 | Free | English | Sep 7, 2026 |
| 2 | Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C Personal injury attorney |
4.9 | 927 | Free | Spanish | Sep 3, 2026 |
| 3 | Texas Trust Law Family law attorney |
4.9 | 662 | Free | English | Sep 6, 2026 |
| 4 | The Law Office of Kevin Bennett Personal injury attorney |
5.0 | 619 | Free | English | Sep 6, 2026 |
| 5 | Gerald M Gonzales Law Office Immigration attorney |
4.7 | 542 | — | English | Sep 2, 2026 |
| 6 | Zinda Law Group Personal injury attorney |
4.8 | 528 | Free | English | Sep 7, 2026 |
| 7 | Gammon Law Office, PLLC Personal injury attorney |
4.8 | 520 | — | English | Sep 2, 2026 |
| 8 | Daniel Stark Injury Lawyers Personal injury attorney |
4.8 | 446 | Free | English | Sep 2, 2026 |
| 9 | Dunham & Jones Personal injury attorney |
4.7 | 436 | Free | English | Sep 2, 2026 |
| 10 | Kelly McMahan Law Attorney |
4.9 | 435 | — | English | Sep 3, 2026 |
Thomas J. Henry Law qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. Details were checked on September 7, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. Details were checked on September 3, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
Texas Trust Law qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. Details were checked on September 6, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
The Law Office of Kevin Bennett qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. Details were checked on September 6, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
Gerald M Gonzales Law Office qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. Details were checked on September 2, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
Zinda Law Group qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. Details were checked on September 7, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
Gammon Law Office, PLLC qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. Details were checked on September 2, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
Daniel Stark Injury Lawyers qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. Details were checked on September 2, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
Dunham & Jones qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. Details were checked on September 2, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
Kelly McMahan Law qualified because its public profile identifies personal injury as a practice focus. Details were checked on September 3, 2026.
Sources: Firm website · Google Business Profile
As of August 26, 2026, 10 Austin firms qualified with 10+ Google reviews and were ranked by Google review count. Paid Featured and Verified badges are profile upgrades and do not affect numbered placement. Confirm current ratings and services directly with each firm.
320 Austin-area firms tagged for personal injury were evaluated. To qualify, a firm needed a practice focus matching personal injury; at least 10 Google reviews (lower threshold for this attribute-focused list). Rankings used Google review count. Firms with insufficient or outdated information were omitted rather than assigned estimated values. The data was last checked on August 26, 2026.
This list orders qualifying firms by Google review count. A high review volume is one signal of public visibility, not a guarantee of fit for your matter.
Firms were ranked using Google review count. Review count, profile freshness, then firm name break ties. Manual reordering is not used on auto-ranked lists.
No. Paid Featured modules, Verified badges, and subscription status do not affect eligibility or numbered placement on this list. Any sponsored module is labeled Featured and kept outside the ranked results.
Ratings, review counts, consultation offers, fee claims, and language claims are dated snapshots. Confirm the current details directly with each firm before hiring.
No. Ratings and review volume are useful signals, but fit, deadlines, conflict checks, communication style, and fee terms matter more. Use this list as a shortlist, then interview firms.
Ask who will handle your matter day to day, what outcomes are realistic, how fees and expenses work, what the first thirty days look like, and what weaknesses they see in your case.
Independent ranking · paid Featured status does not affect placement. Interactive version